•
Possible flaws in the process of the Town’s current Affordable Housing
Program and any legal implications.
Proposition 123 funding requirements and expected state guidance as it
relates to the Town’s process.
90-day review for approval process for applications filed having Affordable
•
•
Housing. Current time-frame to complete Land Use Applications. Implications of
the 90-day review period for projects having concurrent applications.
•
Recommending the removal of Alternate Standards & Expedited Review
Process for Affordable Housing Projects and its possible impact to meeting
Affordable Housing goals and participation in Proposition 123. Recommending
the removal of all the Alternative Standards versus removal of just the Expedited
Review Process portion. Recommending full Removal versus Revision. Other
Alternative/Replacement incentives compliant with Proposition 123.
•
Administrative Reviews and any restrictions based on the size of
developments.
•
Expedited reviews saving time and money, helping the developer to
successfully complete Affordable Housing Projects.
•
•
•
Alternative Equivalent Compliance and its Authorization.
Process to appeal decisions.
Town’s Affordable Housing program related to Metro District point system
requirements.
•
Possible scenarios for consideration of the Agenda Item 25-215 to include the
potential for Conditions for recommending Approval.
•
When, during the Towns Land Use Application process, that a Project could
potentially be allowed to follow the Town’s Affordable Housing Program process.
Authority of the Director when considering a request for a Project to be allowed
to follow the process of the Town’s Affordable Housing program.
•
Discussion expressing concern that the expedited permitting process could
be used for any size development.
Very large development could move forward all the way to TC meeting
•
where final plat and easements would need to be accepted without earlier
review by that body.
•
If the development already has an affordability requirement due to the Metro
District, can they use the expedited permitting process?
The Commission thanked staff its participation in the discussion.
VII. STAFF REPORTS
Chris LaRue, Principal Planner, reported on the following:
•
•
Planning Commission Advanced Agenda template for review.
Agenda for the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on
July 2, 2025.
VIII. COMMISSIONER REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS
Chair Burns reported on the following:
•
Voting for Chair and Vice Chair at the July 2, 2025 Planning Commission
Meeting
•
Kelly Driscoll, Planning Manager, is expected back by the July 2, 2025
Planning Commission Meeting.
Commissioner Braudes reported on the following:
•
He will be away for the Planning Commission meetings scheduled for August
20, 2025 and September 3, 2025.
IX. ADJOURNMENT